Entries Tagged as 'Plays'

First Impressions of the 2010 Season

Regardless of anything else I might write in this posting, this is the best opening performance I've seen from a Tressel lead Buckeye Team.  This was a ginormous victory when you consider that Tressel views a 28-7 score as a blowout.  We definitely came ready to play and there was a lot more working then not working.  Also uncharacteristic of a Tressel team, was the poor play of the special team units.   Normally that is the only thing which goes right in our first game.  Giving Tressel's track record for special teams, this will be straightened quickly and hopefully a nonconcern moving forward.

As you know from my writing, everything starts and ends with TP.  Our paradox of savior and nemesis appeared to be the former in this game.  I remain skeptical that he has improved enough to take us to the Natty.  As always, there were some nice throws where only the receiver could get it and there were some "what the hell is he thinking"  throws to keep you worried.  This night the nice plays outweighed the bad by far.  Unfortunately, Pryor had all night to throw the ball (with the exception of one play where he was forced to throw off balance into coverage) and wasn't really tested.  It's that one play which keeps one worried.  He will have pressure next week and will need to make quick decisons and that is his one major weakness.  The Miami dbacks are one of their weaknesses, so maybe he'll have a repeat of the Rose Bowl.   I still don't see the progression from last year where he's shown he is Heisman caliber.  Hopefully, we'll see this moving forward.

Saine does look like he earned the title of starter and showed his speed as being difficult to handle in the open field.  He definitely doesn't have the size to bruise or show he can "make holes", but his speed makes up for it when he has an open hole.  I was also impressed with Berry, he showed both speed and "hole making" ability and it will be interesting to see how he much playing time he gets moving forward. 

The Oline looks much better this year compared to last year's opener.  It's hard to tell if this is related to the quality of the opponent or is true improvement.  This should be one of our better lines in years with many new faces added.

The only two issues I have with the defense are lack of pressure on the QB and apparent holes deep in the middle of the field.  I know Marshall had a quick strike offense, so that probably offset the apparent lack of pressure by our D line.  Getting Nathan Williams back should improve our pressure and depth on the line.  Our starting safeties allowed a lot of crossing patterns to work for large gains and that has to be a concern for the defense moving forward.  Tyler Moeller is a linebacker playing safety and looks like a beast. 

Everything still hinges on TP's performance.  Saine still doesn't look like a back who can take over a game and the only way to get the ball to our very talented receiving corp is through Pryor.  Maybe down the road Berry will develop into something special, but it wouldn't be till much later this year or next.  I am still more than a little worried about the safetys and hope they'll be able to produce some INTs next week against UM.  For the 4th year in a row,  our Natty chances rest on our performance in the 2nd game of the year.  I was very pleasantly surprised by our defensive play last year against SC and UM isn't SC.  Everything really rests on whether Pryor lays an egg again in a big game.

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

There’s something that smells at the Rose Bowl and it ain’t Rosy

Don't get me wrong, this victory was definitely redemption for the Buckeye nation. The game was what everyone expected it to be, Oregon's speedy offense versus our dominating defense. The outcome was unexpected (at least by the national media) with both our offense and defense dominating the scene. For most of the game, it appeared that Oregon had the speed everyone talked about. Their return game was impressive, I don't ever remember a Tressel lead team which couldn't cover punt and kick returns as poorly as we did last Friday.   The misdirection plays and end arounds also gave our D some fits, but in the end the complete dominance of our D line shut down the Oregon attack.

Our offense managed to score points thanks to some key plays by Pryor both with his legs and his arms.  I didn't really see Pryor do anything different then he has all year round.  As always, he had one or two nice throws and a lot of not so nice ones.  He went to the run and sometimes managed to get a way and sometimes didn't.  Tress called a nice game and deserves a lot of the credit as well.  The big difference here really wasn't Pryor or Tressel, it was the Oregon D.  They really were undersized and their secondary was sub par.  We really need to keep this in context before we coronate Pryor as a savior.

  The national media did everything in their power to throw their kudos at Pryor and coronate him.  As they were praising him to his face in the post game conference, I was screaming NNNNNOOOOOO!!!! at the TV.  Pryor is animal best not fed.  He now has a whole off season to bask in his glory.  I'm afraid that this will be the end of any hope for a championship in the next two years.  It took Tress 2 years to get Pryor's attention and start to listen and that was all thrown to the wayside last week.  I'm afraid the beast is loose and we may be in some trouble.  It's just my feeling based upon his past performances. 

   I also think there shouldn't be any real comparisons to Vince Young.  Athletically they are similar, and I think Pryor is faster.  The big difference is that Young played loosed, had fun and got his teammates involved.  Pryor plays tight, is very serious and pouty on the sidelines,  and is a complete island.  I don't see him as the typical leader (ala Troy Smith) that everyone will rally for when the chips are down.  This will be the biggest reason why we don't get our ultimate redemption next year (unless of course something changes).

   Finally, don't think for a minute that guys like Heyward, Gibson and Chekwa will stay to win it next year.  Lauranitis and Jenkins showed them that by staying an extra year doesn't mean squat and their draft stock went down quite a bit.  We can all dream that they'll stay, but chances are slim.  Next year's weakness will be Oline, DT and secondary.  There will be a particular problem in the secondary as 3/4 of them will be gone.  If Hines stays (and that is a big if as well), we will fill the void of losing the starters. 

   Enjoy the day!  We have redeemed ourselves somewhat and can look forward to another long offseason.  Talk to you in the Spring!

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,